Skip to content
Seven minutes. A new way to see yourself.Get your free results →
Wellington

Facet

What is Greed Avoidance? The Honesty-Humility facet

Greed avoidance is how little pull wealth, luxury and status have on you. It is one of the four facets of Honesty-Humility, the sixth broad factor in the HEXACO model of personality (Lee & Ashton, 2004). A high score means money and the signs of success are not what steers your choices; a low score means they carry weight, which is a motive rather than a fault.

Last updated September 16, 2026.

What does greed avoidance mean?

How little you care about being rich, famous, or surrounded by expensive things. Enoughness as a temperament: wealth, status and luxury simply do not have much pull on you.

The name is awkward, and worth explaining first. Greed in ordinary English is an accusation: wanting more than your share in a way that harms other people. The scale is not measuring that. It measures how much a person is drawn to wealth, luxury goods and the visible signs of high standing, and it is named for the low-greed end because that is how the whole dimension is scored.

What the statements ask is plain and worldly. Whether you love luxury. Whether expensive restaurants appeal. Whether you would enjoy being famous. Whether money is mainly what you are working for. Those are questions about appetite, not conduct. A low score describes a motive: money and what it buys are among the reasons you get up, which is true of many people who work hard and treat others well. A high score says those things pull at you less, which is not the same as having no ambition.

Which personality dimension is greed avoidance part of?

It sits beneath Honesty-Humility, the sixth broad factor in the HEXACO model, alongside sincerity, fairness and modesty. Those four were grouped together because the trait words describing them clustered when the vocabularies of seven languages were analysed, producing six factors rather than five (Ashton et al., 2004). The full picture is on the HEXACO model page.

Wellington measures it with the HEXACO facet scale for greed avoidance (HEXACO-PI-R Honesty-Humility: Greed Avoidance facet). It has no counterpart in the Big Five: the NEO facets touch parts of it without giving materialism a scale of its own (Costa & McCrae, 1992), as does the public-domain item pool behind most free reports (Goldberg et al., 2006). HEXACO moves this content out of Agreeableness, which it leaves as patience and forgiveness under provocation (Ashton et al., 2014).

It belongs with the other three for a reason. Honesty-Humility is read as a willingness not to exploit other people even when exploiting them would pay, and someone who wants wealth and status very much has more to gain from exploiting (Ashton & Lee, 2007). That is motive feeding opportunity, not a claim that wanting money makes anyone dishonest.

How is greed avoidance different from the other Honesty-Humility facets?

It is the only one of the four about wanting rather than doing, which explains most of the confusion and why the four can point different ways in the same person.

The four facets of Honesty-Humility and the behaviour each describes
FacetThe question it answersWhat it looks like in practice
Greed AvoidanceHow much pull do money and status have?You take the worse-paid job with the better work.
FairnessWould I take an advantage that is not mine?You hand back an overpayment nobody noticed.
SincerityDo I charm people or go straight at them?You ask for the pay rise plainly, without the compliments.
ModestyDo I think I am owed special treatment?You wait your turn after a very good year.

The nearest neighbour is fairness, and the two are often taken for the same thing. Fairness is conduct: what you will and will not do to get the money. Greed avoidance is appetite: how much you want it. Someone can want a great deal and refuse every shortcut. The other neighbour is modesty, which shares the status content and reads it differently: modesty asks whether you see yourself as entitled to special treatment, while greed avoidance asks whether you want the things special treatment brings.

What does high greed avoidance look like?

High scorers have a working sense of enough. They notice when a purchase would not improve anything and decline it without effort, take the job that suits them over the job that pays, and are hard to move with a bonus or a title. They are often unbothered by a colleague earning more.

  • Where it helps. Work chosen for its own sake, public service and care roles, and any decision where the expensive option is also the worse one. It is easier to refuse a promotion that would make life worse.
  • What it costs. Money still has to be negotiated, and high scorers often do not bother. They undercharge, leave pay rises unasked for, and underrate the security money buys.

What does low greed avoidance look like?

Low scorers want the good version. They enjoy quality, notice what things signal, and are motivated by pay, position and the prospect of being someone whose name is known. That appetite is often productive: it gets people through training and through the part of a career where nothing is fun yet.

  • Where it helps. Sales, entrepreneurship, competitive fields with clear markers of progress, and any situation where someone has to ask for the money. Low scorers are less likely to be quietly underpaid for years.
  • What it costs. Wanting more is a moving target, and the appetite makes an advantage harder to refuse, which is why the facet sits where it does.

Neither end is a verdict, and circumstances do a great deal of work. People who have been short of money often score lower for reasons that have nothing to do with character.

What does the research say?

Greed avoidance has been one of four narrow scales under Honesty-Humility since the HEXACO Personality Inventory was built. In a validation sample of over 400 people the inventory's scales were internally consistent, fitted the hypothesised six-factor structure and showed adequate convergent validity with external variables (Lee & Ashton, 2004). Each of the four describes a willingness not to exploit others when exploiting them would pay, and appetite for wealth is what makes that moment tempting (Ashton & Lee, 2007).

  • What the parent dimension covers. A review of the research and theory on Honesty-Humility sets out its lexical origins, how it is measured in the HEXACO-PI-R, and why it is theoretically distinct from HEXACO Agreeableness. It also reports that Five-Factor Model instruments capture only part of the variance in Honesty-Humility, which is the case for measuring it separately (Ashton et al., 2014).
  • Why it is a separate factor. Psycholexical studies in seven languages recovered a similar six-factor solution, with Honesty-Humility among the six (Ashton et al., 2004), and five-factor instruments capture only part of that content, spreading what remains across Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (Ashton et al., 2014). Facets are reported alongside the domain because they add bandwidth and predictive power beyond it (Soto & John, 2017).

The honest limit is the same across all four facets: no long-running study follows greed avoidance on its own, so what is known sits at the level of the dimension above it.

How does Wellington measure greed avoidance?

Wellington is a science-based personality assessment from Therabot Labs LLC. It measures personality as continuous traits, built on the Big Five and HEXACO models, and writes the results back as a personal report rather than a type.

The free Snapshot asks 60 questions, takes about 7 minutes and scores six dimensions, the Big Five and Honesty-Humility, so it gives the sixth factor as a whole rather than this facet alone. The first ten questions are answered before anything is asked of you; after question ten you sign in with an email address so answers are saved and results can be shown. There is no card.

Greed avoidance arrives with the Wellington Membership, $4.99 a month, which adds the Portrait, 336 questions in 4 chapters and about 36 minutes, to reach 90 traits including all four Honesty-Humility facets and every Big Five facet. 5 statements measure it, each rated on a five-point accuracy scale. They are averaged and placed against a reference sample as a percentile, then reported in one of three bands: Quiet below the 30th percentile, Balanced to the 70th, High above it. Those norms are provisional until the norming sample is complete, so read a result as a direction rather than an exact position. The bands and the Portrait names exist to make the result easier to talk about; the percentile is the measurement, and it is always shown alongside.

Each band has its own written page, prepared in advance by the writing and psychology team, and your answers choose which one you read. The three are The Bright Ambition for the Quiet band (You want more, and that wanting can build things.), The Comfortable Middle for the Balanced band (You like nice things and know their price.), and The Full Bowl for the High band (You already have enough, and you know it.). None is the good one: the Quiet page describes appetite and what it builds, and the High page names the cost of never asking for the money.

The Wellington Membership, $4.99 a month, reaches 90 traits including every Big Five facet and all 24 character strengths, then adds a short weekly module across 104 weeks toward all 255 traits. See the methodology. Wellington is a wellness tool for reflection, not a medical or psychological diagnosis, and it does not replace care from a qualified professional. It is not built for hiring or selection, and you can export or delete your data at any time.

Questions people ask

Does a low greed avoidance score mean I am greedy?
No. The scale is named for the low-greed end of a dimension, not written as a grade. A low score means money, luxury and status are among the things that motivate you, which is true of a great many hard-working and decent people. What you do to get them is a different facet, fairness.
What is the difference between greed avoidance and fairness?
Appetite against conduct. Greed avoidance asks how much you want wealth and status; fairness asks what you will do to get them. Someone can want a great deal and refuse every shortcut, and someone indifferent to money can still cut a corner. Measuring both is more informative than either alone.
Can greed avoidance change?
Somewhat, and slowly. A meta-analysis of 207 intervention studies found trait measures moved by about a third of a standard deviation over an average of 24 weeks, with Emotional Stability moving most, and the changes held at follow-up (Roberts et al., 2017). People who set a goal to change a trait showed measured change over 16 weeks, helped by planning specific actions (Hudson & Fraley, 2015). Both studied Big Five traits, so applying them here is reasonable rather than proven.

Sources

Peer-reviewed sources for the claims above. Wellington's own reliability figures will be published once the norming sample is complete.

  1. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358.
  2. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166.
  3. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366.
  4. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139–152.
  5. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  6. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.
  7. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143.
  8. Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
  9. Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.

Read next

See your own traits, not a type.

The free Snapshot takes about seven minutes and gives you your personality card and five dimensions. No credit card, no type.

One trait a week

Not ready to take the test? Read one trait a week.

A real page from the report, one practice attached, every week. It is the easiest way to see whether Wellington reads people the way you think it should.