Strengths
Appreciation of beauty as a character strength
Appreciation of beauty and excellence is the character strength that describes how much you notice and feel moved by beautiful things, skilled performances, and people doing something excellently. It is one of the 24 strengths in the VIA classification, where it sits under the virtue of transcendence alongside gratitude, hope, humour and spirituality. Unlike a personality facet, it is a quality valued in its own right and used on purpose.
Last updated September 16, 2026.
What does appreciation of beauty mean as a character strength?
Appreciation of beauty and excellence describes how much you notice and feel moved by beautiful things, skilled performances, and people doing something excellently. In one line, it is the capacity to be stopped in your tracks by something well made, well done, or simply lovely.
The classification treats it as three related experiences that usually travel together in the same person. There is physical beauty, the kind that stops you in a landscape or in front of a painting. There is skill, the pleasure of watching somebody do a difficult thing extremely well, whether that is a violinist, a surgeon or a joiner. And there is moral beauty, the warm lift people report when they see an act of unexpected decency, which is often called elevation.
Two things it is not. It is not being artistic. Making things and being moved by things are different capacities, and plenty of people who never make anything are reliably stopped by what other people made. It is also not taste or expertise. Knowing why a piece of music is constructed the way it is can deepen the response, but the strength is the response, not the knowledge. A person with no vocabulary for architecture can still be unable to walk past a particular building.
Which virtue does appreciation of beauty sit under?
It is one of 24 character strengths grouped under six broad virtues in the classification assembled by Christopher Peterson and Martin Seligman, who set out to describe what is best in people with the seriousness usually reserved for what goes wrong (Peterson & Seligman, 2004). The six virtues are wisdom and knowledge, courage, humanity, justice, temperance and transcendence.
Appreciation of beauty sits under transcendence, which the classification describes as the strengths that connect you to something larger than yourself. Its four companions there are gratitude, hope, humour and spirituality. The grouping makes a claim worth noticing: being moved by a piece of music and being moved by a piece of kindness are treated as the same family of experience, because both take your attention off yourself and hand it to something outside.
The list was built by reading across philosophical, religious and educational traditions for qualities praised almost everywhere, then filtering candidates against criteria such as being fulfilling in itself and expressible without diminishing anyone else. The six virtues are organising headings from that process rather than factors recovered from data (Peterson & Seligman, 2004).
How is appreciation of beauty different from artistic interests?
They describe overlapping experience and are still different kinds of thing. Artistic interests is a Big Five facet, part of Openness to Experience in the NEO model of thirty facets (Costa & McCrae, 1992). It is a descriptive statement about how strongly art, music and beauty pull at you compared with other people, and it is neutral by design: the Big Five came out of decades of lexical research into which trait words travel together, and the model has no good end (Goldberg, 1993).
A strength is the opposite kind of claim. It was chosen because people across traditions value it, it carries a moral flavour, and it is described as something you use rather than something you simply have. That difference changes what a score is for.
| Appreciation of beauty the strength | Artistic interests the facet | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A valued quality, praised across traditions | A descriptive tendency, neutral by design |
| What it covers | Nature, skill and moral excellence | Art, music and aesthetic pull |
| How it is read | Ranked against your own other strengths as well as against other people | Placed against other people as a percentile |
| What you do with it | Use it deliberately, in new settings | Read it as context for your other scores |
The practical difference is the third column of the strength. Artistic interests stops at the aesthetic. The strength includes the shiver at a well executed save in a football match and the lift at somebody quietly doing the right thing, which no art questionnaire asks about.
What does the research say about appreciation of beauty?
This is one of the strengths where the evidence is specific, and it is worth stating plainly rather than flattering the trait.
- Life satisfaction. In a survey of 5,299 adults, the strengths most consistently associated with life satisfaction were hope, zest, gratitude, love and curiosity. Appreciation of beauty was named in the other group: along with creativity, judgment, love of learning and modesty, it was only weakly related to how satisfied people were with their lives (Park et al., 2004). The relationships were generally monotonic, so an excess of any one strength was not associated with less satisfaction.
- Across countries. An analysis of 1,063,921 online responses from 75 nations found the rank order of the 24 strengths was substantially similar from place to place, with honesty, fairness, kindness, judgment and curiosity most endorsed and self-regulation, modesty, prudence and spirituality least (McGrath, 2015). Appreciation of beauty appears in neither list, so it sits in the middle of the ordering. The samples were self-selected, so the ordering is better evidence than any national average.
- Using a strength deliberately. In a randomised, placebo-controlled online study, three of five tested positive psychology exercises produced lasting gains in happiness and reductions in low mood, and two did not (Seligman et al., 2005). A later meta-analysis of signature strengths interventions found they raised life satisfaction and positive affect and lowered reported low mood, with small to moderate effects drawn from 29 effect sizes in 14 articles (Schutte & Malouff, 2019).
A weak link with life satisfaction is not a weak strength. It means that people who are easily moved by beauty are not, on average, noticeably happier with their lives than people who are not, which is a different question from whether the experience is worth having. The survey evidence is also cross-sectional self-report about your own virtues, the kind of question where people tend to present themselves well.
How does appreciation of beauty relate to the Big Five?
As a reading rather than a measured crosswalk, this is the strength that sits most clearly on Openness to Experience. Someone high on it will usually score high on the Openness facets that describe aesthetic and imaginative life, particularly artistic interests and imagination, which the NEO model places under that dimension (Costa & McCrae, 1992).
The links to the other dimensions are looser. Noticing moral beauty leans slightly toward Agreeableness, and making room in a week for concerts, galleries or long walks takes a little Conscientiousness. Neither is part of the strength. None of the Big Five evidence was collected with a strengths inventory, so read the mapping as background about the territory rather than as a finding about the strength.
What do high and low appreciation of beauty look like?
High appreciation of beauty shows up as interruption. The person stops, and lets themselves be stopped.
- A view, a passage of music or a piece of craft can take over the next few minutes.
- Excellence in an unfamiliar field is interesting on its own terms, even when you cannot do it yourself.
- Ordinary things that other people walk past register: light on a wall, a well built sentence, somebody being kind in a queue.
- Physical responses come with it, the prickle at the back of the neck or the catch in the throat.
The costs are real if unglamorous. Attention that is easily captured is attention that is easily diverted, and a strong aesthetic response to your surroundings makes ugly or chaotic environments genuinely harder to work in. It can also shade into connoisseurship, where noticing turns into judging and the pleasure gets narrower rather than wider.
Lower appreciation of beauty is not bluntness. It describes a practical relationship with the world, where things are assessed by what they do rather than how they look, and it comes with advantages: you are not derailed by your surroundings, you are cheap to please, and you spend your attention on the task in front of you. The costs land in the long run, when a life organised entirely around function has few moments in it that are worth nothing and still worth having. Neither end is the good one, and most people sit between them.
How does Wellington measure appreciation of beauty?
Wellington is a science-based personality assessment from Therabot Labs LLC. It measures personality as continuous traits, built on the Big Five and HEXACO models, and writes the results back as a personal report rather than a type.
The free Snapshot is 60 questions, about 7 minutes, and scores six broad dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness to Experience, Honesty-Humility. The first ten questions are answered before anything is asked of you; after question ten you sign in with an email address so your answers are saved and your results can be shown. There is no card. The Snapshot does not cover character strengths.
Appreciation of beauty is scored from 5 statements rated on a five-point accuracy scale, and it is one of the 90 traits in the membership, which adds the Portrait: 336 questions in 4 chapters, the last of them devoted to character. All 24 strengths in the classification are scored there, grouped under their virtue. In the bank this one carries the name Appreciation of Beauty in the Transcendence cluster, and the scales behind it are: VIA-IS Appreciation of Beauty and Excellence; Engagement with Beauty Scale.
Your average is placed against a reference sample as a percentile and reported in one of three bands: Quiet below the 30th percentile, Balanced up to the 70th, High above it. The bands exist to make the result easier to talk about; the percentile is the measurement, and it is always shown alongside. Those norms are provisional until the norming sample is complete. Every trait has three pages written in advance by the writing and psychology team, one per band, and your answers choose which you read. For appreciation of beauty, Quiet is The Practical Eye (You ask what it does, not how it looks), Balanced is The Occasional Witness (Beauty finds you when you make room for it), and High is The Arrested Gaze (The world keeps stopping you, and you keep letting it).
The report then draws a strengths constellation from the pattern, showing which strengths cluster for you and which sit at your growth edge. The Wellington Membership carries the same method on toward 255 traits across eight domains. Wellington is a wellness tool for reflection, not a medical or psychological diagnosis, and it does not replace care from a qualified professional. It is not designed for hiring, and you can export or delete your data at any time.
Questions people ask
- How do I build appreciation of beauty?
- The best supported route is using a strength in a new way rather than manufacturing one you do not have. Three of five tested exercises produced lasting gains in happiness in a randomised, placebo-controlled study (Seligman et al., 2005), and pooled across later work the gains are small but consistent (Schutte & Malouff, 2019). For this strength the usual move is deliberate exposure: a short daily walk with the phone away, or one thing a week watched by somebody who is very good at it.
- Is appreciation of beauty the same as being creative?
- No. Creativity in the classification is about producing something original and useful; appreciation of beauty is about being moved by what exists, whoever made it. They correlate because both sit near Openness to Experience, and they come apart often. Many serious makers are hard to move, and many people who make nothing are stopped daily.
- Can appreciation of beauty change?
- Yes, modestly. A systematic review found trait measures shifted during interventions by about a third of a standard deviation over roughly six months, largest for Emotional Stability, and drawn mostly from therapy and counselling trials (Roberts et al., 2017). In two 16-week studies, wanting to change was followed by measured change, and specific if-then plans helped more than general intentions (Hudson & Fraley, 2015).
- Is a low appreciation of beauty score a bad thing?
- No. Every strength in the classification is desirable, so a profile is a ranking of what is most and least characteristic of you rather than a scale from good to bad. This one is also among the strengths only weakly related to life satisfaction (Park et al., 2004), so a low rank says little about how your life is going. It says your attention goes to function first.
Sources
Peer-reviewed sources for the claims above. Wellington's own reliability figures will be published once the norming sample is complete.
- Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press and the American Psychological Association.
- Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603–619.
- McGrath, R. E. (2015). Character strengths in 75 nations: An update. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 41–52.
- Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421.
- Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1179–1196.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26–34.
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
Read next
See your own traits, not a type.
The free Snapshot takes about seven minutes and gives you your personality card and five dimensions. No credit card, no type.