Skip to content
Seven minutes. A new way to see yourself.Get your free results →
Wellington

Facet

What are artistic interests?

Artistic interests describe how strongly a person is drawn to and moved by art, music, design and natural beauty. In personality psychology this is one of the facets of Openness to Experience, the broad dimension covering curiosity, aesthetics and appetite for the unfamiliar. It measures responsiveness to beautiful and made things, not the ability to make them.

Last updated September 16, 2026.

What do artistic interests mean?

In ordinary use, saying someone has artistic interests suggests hobbies: galleries, concerts, a shelf of poetry. The personality sense is narrower and more physical: aesthetic sensitivity, the degree to which beauty registers on you and does something to you. The plain definition is this: how much you love art, music and beautiful things, and how strongly they move you. Compressed further, it is a hunger for beauty and made things, and a body that answers to a chord, a colour, a line.

The clearest sign of the trait is bodily rather than intellectual: a shiver at a chord, a tightening in the throat at a line of a poem, a stillness in front of a painting you cannot explain. People at the other end hear the same chord, find it pleasant, and move on.

It is not about knowledge: you can know a great deal about music and be unmoved by it, and be flattened by a song you cannot name. It is not about taste either, since a person high on this facet can be undone by a hymn, a warehouse building or a hillside in the rain.

Which personality dimension are artistic interests part of?

Artistic interests is a facet of Openness to Experience, the Big Five dimension gathering curiosity, imagination, aesthetic feeling and unconventional thinking. Aesthetic response is one of the oldest markers of this dimension, and one reason it was once called Culture before Openness settled as the usual name.

Every major instrument includes it. In the NEO inventories it is the second Openness facet, called Aesthetics (Costa & McCrae, 1992). The public-domain IPIP pools, which offer open-licence items as an alternative to commercial inventories, use the label Artistic Interests, and that is the name most free measures show (Goldberg et al., 2006). The BFI-2 names one of its three Openness facets Aesthetic Sensitivity (Soto & John, 2017), and between the domain and its facets sit two aspects, Openness and Intellect, with aesthetics firmly in the first (DeYoung et al., 2007).

Wellington scores it from the NEO-PI-R O2 Aesthetics tradition and its IPIP equivalent. It is one of 13 traits reported beneath Openness to Experience; the hierarchy is in the Big Five facets, explained.

How are artistic interests different from creativity and cultural engagement?

These three collapse into a single idea, being arty, and they separate cleanly in behaviour. Artistic interests is responsiveness: what art does to you when it reaches you. Creativity is production: what you make that did not exist before. Cultural engagement is pursuit: whether you go, read and seek out traditions unlike your own, which shows up in a diary rather than in a feeling.

The combinations are common. Someone high here and low on creativity is moved to tears by music they could never write, and nothing about that is incomplete. Someone high here and low on cultural engagement feels beauty intensely and goes almost nowhere. Imagination is the fourth neighbour, and it is inward: if the shiver requires music in the room, that is this facet rather than that one.

The same five moments, from the responsive end of the facet and from the practical end.
SituationHigh artistic interestsLow artistic interests
A piece of music in a shopYou stop, and find out what it isYou register it as background and carry on
Choosing a kettleHow it looks is part of whether it is rightHow it pours is what decides it
A well-made building on your routeYou look up at it, still, months laterYou know the way, and use it
A poem read aloudSomething physical happens: skin, throat, breathYou follow the meaning and find it interesting or not
A long view over a valleyYou stay longer than the others want toIt is a good view, and then it is time for lunch

What does high artistic interest look like?

High scorers are fed by beauty rather than decorated by it, and they arrange their lives to keep getting some.

  • Music is not background: you cannot use it while doing something else that needs attention.
  • You notice how a room is lit, how a sentence is built, how a piece is held together.
  • You will pay more and wait longer for a version of a thing that is beautiful.
  • Certain works are landmarks in your life, and you can say where you were.

The costs are worth naming. A strong aesthetic response is expensive in time and sometimes in money, and can make a practical decision harder than it needs to be. It can read to others as fussiness. And the responsiveness that makes beauty vivid makes graceless, noisy environments genuinely wearing, which constrains where you can work and live.

What does low artistic interest look like?

Low scorers are not insensitive and they are not uncultured. Their attention goes to function, and the aesthetic layer is simply quieter.

  • You ask what a thing does before you ask how it looks, and you are rarely sold by appearance.
  • You can work anywhere, because your surroundings do not act on you much.
  • You spend on performance rather than on finish, and you are usually right about value.
  • You are honest about art rather than dutiful, which people find refreshing.

The costs run the other way. Work that depends on how something feels to look at is harder to judge from this end, and a design decision may need someone else's eye. There is a social cost too, in circles where enthusiasm for the arts is a marker of belonging, and pretending is worse than saying plainly that it does not do much for you.

What does the research say about artistic interests?

Facet-level research is thinner than domain-level research. What is solid at this level is structural: aesthetics has been one of the six Openness facets since the NEO inventories were published (Costa & McCrae, 1992).

  • It anchors one half of the dimension. Between domain and facet sit two aspects, Openness and Intellect. Aesthetic feeling and imagination belong to the first; enjoyment of abstract problems belongs to the second (DeYoung et al., 2007).
  • The structure is not local to one culture. Observer ratings collected in fifty cultures reproduced the five-factor model, Openness included (McCrae & Terracciano, 2005).
  • Learning and school. Openness predicted training proficiency across occupations in the meta-analysis of the Big Five and job performance, where Conscientiousness predicted performance across all of them (Barrick & Mount, 1991). Academic performance correlated with Openness, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness in a meta-analysis drawing on samples of more than 70,000 (Poropat, 2009).
  • Age. Across 92 longitudinal samples Openness rose in adolescence and fell again in old age, while Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability rose mostly between twenty and forty (Roberts et al., 2006). In a cross-sectional sample of 132,515 adults aged twenty-one to sixty, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness were still rising through early and middle adulthood (Srivastava et al., 2003).

How does Wellington measure artistic interests?

Wellington is a science-based personality assessment from Therabot Labs LLC. It measures personality as continuous traits, built on the Big Five and HEXACO models, and writes the results back as a personal report rather than a type.

The free Snapshot is 60 questions, about 7 minutes, across six dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness to Experience, Honesty-Humility, and reports Openness to Experience as a whole rather than its facets. The first ten questions are answered before anything is asked of you; after question ten you sign in with an email address so answers are saved and results can be shown. There is no card.

Artistic interests itself is measured by 6 statements on a five-point accuracy scale, and it is reported in the membership. The Wellington Membership, $4.99 a month, adds the Portrait, 336 questions in 4 chapters, to reach 90 traits including every Big Five facet and all 24 VIA character strengths, then adds a weekly module over 104 weeks toward all 255 traits.

Your score is the average of those statements, set against a reference sample as a percentile and reported in one of three bands: Quiet below the 30th percentile, Balanced to the 70th, High above. Those norms are provisional until the norming sample is complete. The bands and the Portrait names exist to make the result easier to talk about; the percentile is the measurement, and it is always shown alongside. Each band has its own page, written in advance by the writing and psychology team: Quiet is The Practical Eye (You ask what a thing does before asking how it looks), Balanced is The Quiet Appreciator (You feel beauty when it arrives; you do not chase it), High is The Beholder (Beauty is not decoration for you. It is nourishment). The methodology walks through a worked example and the scoring in full.

Wellington is a wellness tool for reflection, not a medical or psychological diagnosis, and it does not replace care from a qualified professional. It is not built for hiring or selection, and you can export or delete your data at any time.

Questions people ask

Can artistic interests change?
Modestly, and through exposure rather than resolve. A systematic review of 207 intervention studies found trait change averaging about a third of a standard deviation, largest for Emotional Stability and drawn mostly from therapy and counselling trials (Roberts et al., 2017). In two 16-week experiments, people who wanted to change a trait did shift on it, and those trained to form specific implementation intentions changed more than those given a simpler nudge (Hudson & Fraley, 2015).
Do you need to be good at art to score high?
No. This facet measures how strongly art and beauty affect you, not what you can produce. Making things is a separate facet, creativity, and the two are only loosely linked. Some of the highest scorers have never made anything and never intend to: they are the audience the work was made for.
Is a low score on artistic interests a sign of a narrow mind?
No. It describes where your attention naturally goes, toward function, people or activity rather than the look and sound of things. People at this end are often the most honest audience an artist can have, because their praise is not automatic. Open-mindedness and tolerance are measured separately, and a person can be high on both.
Why do some people get chills from music and others do not?
Because aesthetic responsiveness varies between people as other traits do, and this facet is the part of Openness that captures it. Strong physical responses to art, the shiver or the caught breath, are a well-known marker of the aesthetic side of the dimension. Familiarity and setting matter too.

Sources

Peer-reviewed sources for the claims above. Wellington's own reliability figures will be published once the norming sample is complete.

  1. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
  2. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.
  3. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143.
  4. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.
  5. McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547–561.
  6. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
  7. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
  8. Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
  9. Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1041–1053.
  10. Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
  11. Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.

Read next

See your own traits, not a type.

The free Snapshot takes about seven minutes and gives you your personality card and five dimensions. No credit card, no type.

One trait a week

Not ready to take the test? Read one trait a week.

A real page from the report, one practice attached, every week. It is the easiest way to see whether Wellington reads people the way you think it should.