Facet
What is creativity?
Creativity is the tendency to produce ideas, objects or methods that are both new and useful, rather than repeating the version that already exists. In personality psychology it is one of the facets of Openness to Experience, the broad dimension covering curiosity, art and appetite for the unfamiliar. It describes output, not the size of an inner life.
Last updated September 16, 2026.
What does creativity mean?
In ordinary use, creativity is the ability to make something that did not exist before. Researchers add a second condition, which keeps the word from covering anything merely odd: the thing has to be new and it has to work. The plain definition is this: how often you come up with new and useful ideas or ways of doing things. Compressed further, it is the making impulse, the mind that reaches for what does not exist yet and gives it a shape.
The word carries a class assumption that the trait does not. Creativity in this sense is not confined to painting, writing or design. It shows up in a new way to route a delivery, a joke built on the spot, a repair improvised from what was in the drawer.
It is also not a talent score. The questions ask about a disposition: how readily you generate alternatives, and how uncomfortable you are leaving a thing as you found it. Skill, domain knowledge and years of work decide whether that disposition produces anything worth having, and none of those are measured here.
Which personality dimension is creativity part of?
Creativity is a facet of Openness to Experience, the Big Five dimension gathering curiosity, aesthetic feeling, unconventional thinking and the pull toward the new. Of the five, this is the dimension most directly about producing and entertaining novelty, so a facet for making things belongs here rather than under Conscientiousness, where finishing lives.
The instruments carve it in different places. HEXACO measures a Creativity facet directly within its Openness to Experience factor (Lee & Ashton, 2004). The NEO inventories spread the same ground across Fantasy, Aesthetics and Ideas (Costa & McCrae, 1992), while the BFI-2 names one of its three Openness facets Creative Imagination (Soto & John, 2017). Creativity is also one of the 24 character strengths in the VIA classification, under the virtue of wisdom (Peterson & Seligman, 2004).
Wellington scores creativity from the HEXACO Openness Creativity facet and the VIA strength of the same name. It is one of 13 traits reported beneath Openness to Experience; the hierarchy is in the Big Five facets, explained.
How is creativity different from imagination and resourcefulness?
Ordinary speech uses these three interchangeably, and they come apart cleanly in behaviour. Imagination is inward: the scene running in your head, whether or not anyone sees it. Creativity is outward: something leaves you and exists in the world. Resourcefulness is creativity under constraint, judged by whether the problem got solved rather than by whether the answer was new.
The combinations are recognisable. A vivid daydreamer with low creativity has a rich private world and an empty workbench, which is a perfectly good way to live. Two more neighbours: artistic interests is responsiveness rather than production, since being moved by music is not the same as writing any, and trait intellect is the enjoyment of abstract ideas, which feeds some creative work and none of other kinds.
| Situation | High creativity | Low creativity |
|---|---|---|
| A recipe you have made twenty times | You change one thing, most times | You make it the way it works, and it works |
| A process at work that is fine but dull | You propose a different way of doing it | You run it well and look for the next task |
| An unfamiliar problem with no method | You generate six options before judging any | You find who has solved it and copy that |
| A blank page | The blankness is the appealing part | You would rather be given the brief |
| Someone else's good idea | You add to it, sometimes past what was wanted | You take it as it is and make it run properly |
What does high creativity look like?
High scorers leave a mark on whatever passes through their hands, usually without deciding to.
- You produce alternatives quickly, including bad ones, and you are not embarrassed by the bad ones.
- A constraint reads as a puzzle rather than as a wall.
- You connect two unrelated things and get something that works, often enough that people ask you to.
- Half-finished projects accumulate, because starting is the part you like.
The costs are real. Novelty is expensive to maintain: a changed process needs explaining and defending, and is not always worth what it costs the people around you. Ideas are cheap to start and expensive to finish, so high creativity with low Conscientiousness leaves a trail of promising beginnings. And the reflex to improve can read as an inability to accept a settled answer.
What does low creativity look like?
Low scorers are not uninventive, and they are certainly not unskilled. They put their effort into doing the known thing extremely well.
- You learn the established method thoroughly, and can explain why each step is there.
- Your work is predictable in the way people want the brakes on a car to be predictable.
- You are hard to sell a novelty to, so you rarely pay for one that was not needed.
- You finish, because you are not diverted halfway by a more interesting version.
The costs run the other way. When a situation has no precedent, a preference for the proven method leaves you waiting for one to appear. Fields that shift quickly can strand a well-practised approach after the ground has moved. And a good idea from someone else can arrive looking like an inconvenience and be refused before it is understood.
What does the research say about creativity?
Facet-level evidence is thinner than domain-level evidence, and the trustworthy statements are mostly structural. Creativity has a settled place in two established systems: it is an Openness facet in the HEXACO inventory (Lee & Ashton, 2004) and one of the 24 character strengths in the VIA classification, grouped there under the virtue of wisdom (Peterson & Seligman, 2004).
- It belongs to Openness. Between domain and facet sit two aspects, Openness and Intellect (DeYoung et al., 2007). Creative work draws on both, in proportions that vary by field.
- The structure is not local to one culture. Observer ratings collected in fifty cultures reproduced the five-factor model, Openness included (McCrae & Terracciano, 2005).
- Learning and school. Openness predicted training proficiency across occupations in the meta-analysis of the Big Five and job performance, where Conscientiousness predicted performance across all of them (Barrick & Mount, 1991). Academic performance correlated with Openness, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness in a meta-analysis drawing on samples of more than 70,000 (Poropat, 2009).
- Strengths can be used more. Across 29 effect sizes from 14 articles, signature strengths interventions raised life satisfaction (g = 0.42) and positive feeling (g = 0.32) (Schutte & Malouff, 2019), and in a randomised placebo-controlled study three of five positive psychology exercises lastingly increased happiness while two did not (Seligman et al., 2005). That is deployment rather than raising the trait.
- Age. Across 92 longitudinal samples Openness rose in adolescence and fell again in old age, while Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability rose mostly between twenty and forty (Roberts et al., 2006). In a cross-sectional sample of 132,515 adults aged twenty-one to sixty, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness were still rising through early and middle adulthood (Srivastava et al., 2003).
How does Wellington measure creativity?
Wellington is a science-based personality assessment from Therabot Labs LLC. It measures personality as continuous traits, built on the Big Five and HEXACO models, and writes the results back as a personal report rather than a type.
The free Snapshot is 60 questions, about 7 minutes, across six dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness to Experience, Honesty-Humility, and reports Openness to Experience as a whole rather than its facets. The first ten questions are answered before anything is asked of you; after question ten you sign in with an email address so answers are saved and results can be shown. There is no card.
Creativity itself is measured by 7 statements on a five-point accuracy scale, and it is reported in the membership. The Wellington Membership, $4.99 a month, adds the Portrait, 336 questions in 4 chapters, to reach 90 traits including every Big Five facet and all 24 VIA character strengths, then adds a weekly module over 104 weeks toward all 255 traits.
Your score is the average of those statements, set against a reference sample as a percentile and reported in one of three bands: Quiet below the 30th percentile, Balanced to the 70th, High above. Those norms are provisional until the norming sample is complete. The bands and the Portrait names exist to make the result easier to talk about; the percentile is the measurement, and it is always shown alongside. Each band has its own page, written in advance by the writing and psychology team: Quiet is The Faithful Craftsperson (You perfect the proven way rather than chase the new one), Balanced is The Practical Innovator (You improve things when they need it, not for sport), High is The Maker (You cannot leave the world exactly as you found it). The methodology walks through a worked example and the scoring in full.
Wellington is a wellness tool for reflection, not a medical or psychological diagnosis, and it does not replace care from a qualified professional. It is not built for hiring or selection, and you can export or delete your data at any time.
Questions people ask
- Can creativity change?
- Modestly, and through practice rather than intention. A systematic review of 207 intervention studies found trait change averaging about a third of a standard deviation, largest for Emotional Stability and drawn mostly from therapy and counselling trials (Roberts et al., 2017). In two 16-week experiments, people who wanted to change a trait did shift on it, and those trained to form specific implementation intentions changed more than those given a simpler nudge (Hudson & Fraley, 2015).
- Is creativity a personality trait or a skill?
- Both, and they are measured differently. As a trait it is a disposition: how readily you generate alternatives and how strongly you want to change what you find. As a skill it is domain-specific, earned from technique, knowledge and practice. A questionnaire reports the disposition; whether the work is any good depends on the skill.
- Do you have to be artistic to be creative?
- No. The trait covers any situation where you produce something new and workable: a route, a process, a lesson plan, a joke, a repair. Responsiveness to art is a separate facet, artistic interests, and it need not travel with this one. People who make things in unglamorous domains often score high here.
- Why do creative people leave so much unfinished?
- Because creativity and follow-through sit on different dimensions. The appetite for a new version belongs to Openness; finishing belongs to Conscientiousness, and the two vary independently, so someone high on the first and low on the second accumulates beginnings. The usual remedy is structural: fewer open projects, finished one at a time.
Sources
Peer-reviewed sources for the claims above. Wellington's own reliability figures will be published once the norming sample is complete.
- Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–358.
- Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification. Oxford University Press and the American Psychological Association.
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143.
- DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.
- McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547–561.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
- Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–421.
- Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1179–1196.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1041–1053.
- Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
Read next
See your own traits, not a type.
The free Snapshot takes about seven minutes and gives you your personality card and five dimensions. No credit card, no type.