Facet
What is imagination?
Imagination is the tendency to picture what is not in front of you: to daydream, to run stories and scenes in your head, and to see how a situation could be arranged differently. In personality psychology it is one of the facets of Openness to Experience, the broad dimension covering curiosity, art and appetite for the unfamiliar.
Last updated September 16, 2026.
What does imagination mean?
In ordinary use, imagination is the power to form pictures of things that are absent, invented or merely possible: a remembered kitchen, an argument rehearsed in the shower, a room you have not built yet. The plain definition is this: how much you daydream, make up stories in your head, and picture how things could be different. Compressed further, it is a mind that keeps a second world running, where what is not yet real can be walked through and tried on.
Two things are measured at once: how vivid the inner picture is, and how often you go there. Everybody can imagine. The facet asks whether your mind drifts into invented scenes without being sent, and whether those scenes are detailed enough to be worth the visit.
It is not being out of touch with what is real: a person can keep an elaborate inner world and pay the bills on time, and how organised that practical life is belongs to Conscientiousness. Nor is it a claim about ability. The questions ask what a mind does by preference, not how well it performs.
Which personality dimension is imagination part of?
Imagination is a facet of Openness to Experience, the Big Five dimension gathering curiosity, aesthetic feeling, unconventional thinking and the pull toward the new. When personality descriptors are analysed, words for imaginative and inventive cluster with curious and artistic rather than with warm, dutiful or calm.
Every major instrument reserves a place for it. In the NEO inventories it is the first Openness facet, named Fantasy (Costa & McCrae, 1992). The public-domain IPIP pools, which offer open-licence items as an alternative to commercial inventories, label the same ground Imagination, and that is the name most free measures show (Goldberg et al., 2006). The BFI-2 covers Openness with three facets, one of them Creative Imagination (Soto & John, 2017), and between the domain and its facets sit two aspects, Openness and Intellect, with fantasy in the first (DeYoung et al., 2007).
Wellington scores it from the NEO-PI-R O1 Fantasy tradition and its IPIP equivalent. It is one of 13 traits reported beneath Openness to Experience; the hierarchy is in the Big Five facets, explained.
How is imagination different from creativity and artistic interests?
Ordinary speech treats these three as one thing, usually called being creative, and they separate cleanly in behaviour. Imagination is inside: the scene, the story, the alternative version of a conversation. Creativity is what comes out, ideas and objects that did not exist before you made them. Artistic interests is responding rather than making, how strongly a chord or a colour moves you.
The combinations are the proof. Someone high on imagination and low on creativity has a rich inner life that never leaves the building, and the scenes are the point. Two further neighbours: cultural engagement shows up in a diary rather than in the head, and trait intellect is conceptual where imagination is pictorial.
| Situation | High imagination | Low imagination |
|---|---|---|
| A long train journey with no phone | You are elsewhere within a minute, and time goes | You watch the fields, and the time is simply long |
| Reading a novel | You see the house, the weather and the faces | You follow the story and skip the pictures |
| Planning a room | You walk three versions of it before moving anything | You measure, buy, and adjust once it is in place |
| A difficult conversation ahead | You rehearse four versions, two of them impossible | You decide what to say, then say it |
| A vague brief at work | You fill the gap with possibilities, some useful | You go back and ask what is actually wanted |
What does high imagination look like?
High scorers keep a second world running alongside the first, and it is usually well furnished.
- Your mind supplies pictures without being asked, and they are specific rather than vague.
- You can try a decision on in advance by living a version of it through.
- Boredom is rarely a problem in a queue, a waiting room or a dull meeting.
- You remember places you have never been, because you built them while reading.
The costs are specific too. A mind that rehearses well rehearses everything, so a worry plays out in the same detail as a pleasure. The inner version of a plan is always more elegant than the built one. And attention that leaves the room takes something with it: people notice when they are being half-heard.
What does low imagination look like?
Low scorers are not literal-minded or dull. They are present, and their attention stays where they put it.
- You see what is in front of you, without a layer of invention over it.
- You are not easily carried off by a story about how good something could be.
- Your memory of an event is closer to the event, because you added less to it.
- You waste little time on scenarios that were never going to happen.
The costs run the other way. Planning that depends on picturing an unbuilt future is harder work, and a proposal may have to be drawn before you can judge it. Empathy that runs through imagining a life unlike your own takes deliberate effort, though asking gets you there as well as guessing does.
What does the research say about imagination?
Facet-level research is thinner than domain-level research, and most of what can be said about imagination is inherited from its parent dimension. What is solid at this level is structural: fantasy has been one of the six Openness facets since the NEO inventories were published (Costa & McCrae, 1992).
- It sits in the aesthetic half of the dimension. Between domain and facet are two aspects, Openness and Intellect; imagination and aesthetic feeling belong to the first (DeYoung et al., 2007).
- The structure is not local to one culture. Observer ratings collected in fifty cultures reproduced the five-factor model, Openness included (McCrae & Terracciano, 2005).
- Learning and school. Openness predicted training proficiency across occupations in the meta-analysis of the Big Five and job performance, where Conscientiousness predicted performance across all of them (Barrick & Mount, 1991). Academic performance correlated with Openness, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness in a meta-analysis drawing on samples of more than 70,000 (Poropat, 2009).
- Age. Across 92 longitudinal samples Openness rose in adolescence and fell again in old age, while Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability rose mostly between twenty and forty (Roberts et al., 2006). In a cross-sectional sample of 132,515 adults aged twenty-one to sixty, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness were still rising through early and middle adulthood (Srivastava et al., 2003).
How does Wellington measure imagination?
Wellington is a science-based personality assessment from Therabot Labs LLC. It measures personality as continuous traits, built on the Big Five and HEXACO models, and writes the results back as a personal report rather than a type.
The free Snapshot is 60 questions, about 7 minutes, across six dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness to Experience, Honesty-Humility, and reports Openness to Experience as a whole rather than its facets. The first ten questions are answered before anything is asked of you; after question ten you sign in with an email address so answers are saved and results can be shown. There is no card.
Imagination itself is measured by 6 statements on a five-point accuracy scale, and it is reported in the Wellington Membership, $4.99 a month, which adds the Portrait, 336 questions in 4 chapters, to reach 90 traits including every Big Five facet and all 24 VIA character strengths, then a weekly module over 104 weeks toward all 255 traits.
Your score is the average of those statements, set against a reference sample as a percentile and reported in one of three bands: Quiet below the 30th percentile, Balanced to the 70th, High above. Those norms are provisional until the norming sample is complete. The bands and the Portrait names exist to make the result easier to talk about; the percentile is the measurement, and it is always shown alongside. Each band has its own page, written in advance by the writing and psychology team: Quiet is The Clear Lens (You see what is there, and that is a rarer gift than it sounds), Balanced is The Steady Dreamer (You can wander inward, and you can find your way back), High is The Inner Cinema (There is always another world playing behind your eyes). The methodology walks through a worked example and the scoring in full.
Wellington is a wellness tool for reflection, not a medical or psychological diagnosis, and it does not replace care from a qualified professional. It is not built for hiring or selection, and you can export or delete your data at any time.
Questions people ask
- Can imagination change?
- Modestly, and through what you do rather than what you decide. A systematic review of 207 intervention studies found trait change averaging about a third of a standard deviation, largest for Emotional Stability and drawn mostly from therapy and counselling trials (Roberts et al., 2017). In two 16-week experiments, people who wanted to change a trait did shift on it, and those trained to form specific implementation intentions changed more than those given a simpler nudge (Hudson & Fraley, 2015).
- Is imagination the same as creativity?
- No. Imagination is what your mind does privately: building scenes, stories and alternative versions of things. Creativity is what you produce, ideas or objects that are both new and useful. They come apart often enough to be measured separately, since plenty of daydreamers make nothing and plenty of makers picture very little.
- Is a low imagination score a problem?
- No. It describes a mind that stays with what is in front of it, an advantage in work rewarding accurate description and resistance to a persuasive story. What it costs is ease with unbuilt futures and with lives unlike your own, and both can be worked around by asking questions rather than by daydreaming on command.
- Does a rich imagination mean you are out of touch with reality?
- No. The facet measures how vivid and frequent your inner scenes are, not whether you confuse them with the world. An active inner life alongside an ordinary practical one is the common pattern. If inner experience becomes distressing or hard to set aside, that is a question for a qualified professional rather than a questionnaire.
Sources
Peer-reviewed sources for the claims above. Wellington's own reliability figures will be published once the norming sample is complete.
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.
- Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 117–143.
- DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.
- McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 547–561.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
- Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1041–1053.
- Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
Read next
See your own traits, not a type.
The free Snapshot takes about seven minutes and gives you your personality card and five dimensions. No credit card, no type.