Guide
How to be more conscientious: what the evidence supports
You become more conscientious by working on its two separable aspects, orderliness and industriousness, with specific plans and a changed environment rather than a general resolve to try harder. Change through deliberate effort is real but modest, and it builds on a trait that already tends to rise through adulthood on its own.
Last updated September 16, 2026.
What is conscientiousness, and why does it matter?
Conscientiousness is the Big Five dimension for how reliably a person turns intention into action, and it splits into two correlated but separable aspects. Industriousness is the effort side: sustained work on a goal after the interesting part has passed. Orderliness is the structure side: keeping things, plans and time in a state you can find and use (DeYoung et al., 2007). A person can be strong on one and ordinary on the other, which is why a tidy desk and a finished project are not the same achievement. What is Conscientiousness? covers the full definition and every facet the trait contains.
It is worth the effort because the trait carries an unusually wide evidence base. Conscientiousness is related to the leading behavioural contributors to mortality, in the protective direction, across smoking, diet, activity, drinking and risky driving alike (Bogg & Roberts, 2004). Why conscientiousness matters sets out that case in full, including its reach into work and study, so this page will not repeat it.
Does conscientiousness improve on its own as you get older?
To some extent, yes, and it is worth knowing before you decide how hard to push. A meta-analysis of 92 longitudinal samples found mean levels of conscientiousness rising across adulthood, most steeply between twenty and forty, alongside similar rises in emotional stability and social dominance, while agreeableness changed mainly in old age (Roberts, Walton & Viechtbauer, 2006). Psychologists call this the maturity principle. Most people become steadier and more responsible simply by living longer, working longer and taking on more that depends on them.
That natural drift is real, but it is slow, uneven across people, and not something you can rely on for a specific goal by a specific date. The rest of this page is about the part you can act on directly.
Can you deliberately become more conscientious, and how much?
Yes, modestly, and the size of what is realistic is worth stating plainly rather than oversold. A systematic review of 207 intervention studies found trait measures moving by about a third of a standard deviation over roughly six months, largest for Emotional Stability, and drawn mostly from therapy and counselling trials (Roberts et al., 2017). Conscientiousness responds to the same kind of structured, sustained effort, just without needing a therapist's office to do it.
Wanting to change also does something on its own. Across two 16-week studies, people who set out to raise a trait tended to show measured increases in it, and specific plans mattered: an intervention that trained participants to write implementation intentions, exact if-then plans naming a behaviour, a time and a place, helped them get there, while a simpler intervention did not (Hudson & Fraley, 2015). Wanting to change was followed by measured change, and specific plans helped more than general intentions.
A three-month app-based programme tested against a waitlist control with 1,523 people produced self-reported change of about d = 0.5 in the traits participants had set out to shift, evidence that a sustained, structured programme outside a therapy setting can move a trait too (Stieger et al., 2021). None of this is fast. All of it is real.
What practices actually build orderliness and industriousness?
Because the two aspects are separable, the practices that build them differ. Orderliness practices reduce the number of decisions your surroundings ask of you. Industriousness practices reduce the gap between deciding to act and actually starting.
| Aspect | Practice | Facet it exercises |
|---|---|---|
| Orderliness | One home for each thing | Orderliness |
| Orderliness | A weekly reset | Orderliness |
| Orderliness | A written list | Orderliness |
| Industriousness | A fixed start time | Self-Discipline |
| Industriousness | The two-minute start | Self-Discipline |
| Industriousness | Finish one thing before opening the next | Industriousness |
A home for each thing means the object goes back to the same place every time, so finding it is never a search. A weekly reset is a fixed slot, the same day and hour, where you clear the backlog that built up rather than letting it compound. A written list moves the plan out of memory and onto a page, where it cannot be quietly dropped.
A fixed start time removes the daily negotiation over when to begin, because the time was set in advance rather than chosen under resistance. The two-minute start shrinks the first step until it is smaller than your reluctance to do it, since starting a task is usually harder than continuing one. Finishing one thing before opening the next keeps effort from scattering across half-started work, which is where industriousness leaks away fastest.
Why does environment beat willpower?
Every practice above works the same way: it moves a decision from the moment of temptation, when you are tired, bored or interrupted, to a calmer moment beforehand, when you are not. That is also the shape of the implementation intentions that performed best in the trials above (Hudson & Fraley, 2015). Willpower framing asks you to win the same argument with yourself repeatedly. Environment design tries to make sure the argument does not happen.
This is also why the practices are unglamorous. None of them depends on feeling motivated, because motivation is unreliable and a fixed start time or a written list is not. Can personality change? covers the wider evidence on trait change beyond conscientiousness, and how to build self-discipline goes deeper into the industriousness side, including what to do after a lapse.
How does Wellington measure conscientiousness?
Wellington is a science-based personality assessment from Therabot Labs LLC. It measures personality as continuous traits, built on the Big Five and HEXACO models, and writes the results back as a personal report rather than a type.
The free Snapshot is 60 questions, about 7 minutes, and scores six dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness to Experience, Honesty-Humility. The first ten questions are answered before anything is asked of you; after question ten you sign in with an email address so your answers are saved and your results can be shown. There is no card.
Every trait is reported as a percentile against the reference sample. The three bands, Quiet below the 30th percentile, Balanced to the 70th, High above, and the Portrait names exist to make the result easier to talk about; the percentile is the measurement, and it is always shown alongside. Norms are provisional until the norming sample is complete.
The Wellington Membership, $4.99 a month, adds the Portrait, 336 questions in 4 chapters, reaching 90 traits, so Orderliness, Self-Discipline and Industriousness above are each reported individually rather than folded into the single Conscientiousness score, and it adds a short weekly module over 104 weeks toward every trait it measures.
Wellington is a wellness tool for reflection, not a medical or psychological diagnosis, and it does not replace care from a qualified professional. It is not built for hiring, and you can export or delete your data at any time.
Questions people ask
- How long does it take to become more conscientious?
- Weeks to months, not days. People who set out to change a trait showed measurable movement within 16 weeks, faster with a specific if-then plan than with a general intention (Hudson & Fraley, 2015). A wider review of intervention studies found trait measures shifting by about a third of a standard deviation over roughly six months (Roberts et al., 2017). Expect a steady nudge over a season rather than a different person by next week.
- Are orderliness and industriousness the same thing?
- No. They are the two correlated aspects that sit beneath the single Conscientiousness score, one covering structure and one covering effort (DeYoung et al., 2007). A person can keep a spotless system and still avoid the hard task, or work relentlessly from a chaotic desk. Knowing which one is lagging tells you which practices in the table above are worth trying first.
- Will I become more conscientious just by getting older, without doing anything?
- Somewhat, on average. Longitudinal research finds mean levels of conscientiousness rising through adulthood, especially between twenty and forty (Roberts, Walton & Viechtbauer, 2006). That drift is real but slow and uneven across people, so it is not a substitute for deliberate practice if you are working toward a specific change now.
- Does becoming more conscientious mean becoming rigid?
- Not necessarily, though it is a real risk at the extreme. The practices here aim at reliability, finishing what you start, keeping track of what matters, not at treating every plan as unbreakable. Orderliness and industriousness are tools for getting things done, and they work best alongside the judgement to loosen a plan when the situation genuinely calls for it.
Sources
Peer-reviewed sources for the claims above. Wellington's own reliability figures will be published once the norming sample is complete.
- DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896.
- Bogg, T., & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.
- Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25.
- Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141.
- Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490–507.
- Stieger, M., Flückiger, C., Rüegger, D., Kowatsch, T., Roberts, B. W., & Allemand, M. (2021). Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2017548118.
Read next
See your own traits, not a type.
The free Snapshot takes about seven minutes and gives you your personality card and five dimensions. No credit card, no type.